INSPECT’s Part 9, Level 1 and Level 2 assessments quickly determine which crack-like flaws can be safely left in service and which require more investigation.  Part 9, Level 1 is a conservative screening assessment.  Because of this, only minimal data entry is needed to perform the assessment.  With INSPECT, you model the component the crack is on, enter the crack’s description and press F3.  If INSPECT determines that a Level 2 assessment is needed simply switch to the Level 2 option and enter the additional Level 2 details.

Although simple to use, INSPECT’s crack-like flaw assessments are in compliance with all the requirements of API 579-1 Part 9.  For instance, crack-like flaw assessments often require a Part 3 (brittle fracture) screening which INSPECT performs automatically.  If the crack is out of plane, INSPECT determines the equivalent crack length for you.

Get More Information on INSPECT’s Part 9 Implementation
INSPECT Primary Stress Polynomial 4th Order
INSPECT Part 9 Level 2 Primary Stress

Level 2 Crack-Like Flaw Assessments

The INSPECT Level 2 crack-like flaw assessment features several unique capabilities as described below.  INSPECT’s industry leading FFS technology includes a Level 2 assessment tool that provides Engineers with a simplified solution to a complex problem.

INSPECT includes an interactive input where changing crack parameters provides immediate feedback.  The center piece of this is INSPECT’s real time Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) Preview.  The INSPECT FAD Preview allows Engineers to stay focused on assessing the crack instead of  having to jump around between input dialogs or multiple programs.  A graphical representation of the crack is shown on the INSPECT 3D model as well.

Performing a Level 2 Crack-Like Flaw Assessment with INSPECT

The FAD and Primary Stress

Primary stresses are those stresses required to satisfy the laws of static equilibrium.  They are not self limiting, that is they are not relieved by local yielding or by limits to thermal growth.  When performing crack assessments, primary stress affects both the Kr and LPr values from the FAD.  As a result, changing primary stress affects the placement of results on both the  X and Y axis on the FAD.

INSPECT includes the COMPRESS ASME calculation engine.  One benefit of this is that primary stresses are determined using the equipment’s Original Code of Construction.  INSPECT contains a database of Older Codes to help evaluate older equipment as well.

INSPECT offers a selection of methods for including primary stress in a Level 2 assessment.  Engineers can choose from Automatic Stress Determination as well as user defined  Linear, Uniform, Weight (Numerical Integration) and Polynomial stress distributions.

INSPECT automatically determines supplemental loads for cracks orientated in the circumferential direction.  Engineers may also override this and specify their own supplemental loading.  This is also beneficial for cases where a simple component is modeled and external loads such as Wind or Seismic need to be considered.

INSPECT Part 9 Level 2 Integral Edge and Base
INSPECT Part 9 Level 2 Secondary Stress

The FAD and Secondary Stress

Secondary stresses are often called “self-limiting” stresses.  They are typically caused by thermal gradients and\or local geometric discontinuities.  Because they can attain large values, secondary stresses often drive crack formation and growth.  INSPECT’s interactive FAD quickly shows how including secondary stresses in the assessment affects the analysis.  Secondary stresses impact the value of Kr resulting in vertical movement (Y axis position changes) on the FAD.

Secondary stress profile options include Automatic, Linear, Uniform, Weight (numerical integration) and 4th Order Polynomial.

In addition, if it has been determined that secondary stresses are negligible an option is provided to remove them from the assessment.

The FAD and Residual (Weld) Stresses

Residual stresses are stresses that remain in a welded joint after fabrication.  If PWHT was not performed residual stresses are something that must be considered.  Even in the absence of external loads or thermal gradients residual stresses can be a contributing factor in equipment failures.  Since residual stresses are categorized as secondary they affect the Kr (X-axis) result location on the FAD.

INSPECT utilizes the method found in API-579 Annex 9D when determining residual stresses.

INSPECT Part 9 Level 2 Residual Stress
A Part 9 Limiting Flaw Curve generated by INSPECT

Limiting Flaw Curve

An important step in assessing Crack-Like flaws is determining the crack’s Limiting Flaw Curve.  INSPECT automatically generates a chart showing the Critical Flaw Dimensions and where the crack being assessed falls on the chart.  INSPECT creates this chart by iterating the API 579 Part 9 calculations and plotting the results.  INSPECT performs this calculation intensive operation quickly saving time and effort.

Get More Information on INSPECT’s Part 9 Implementation

Part 9 Material Toughness Options

INSPECT provides a variety of options for performing Material Toughness evaluations.  You may choose from Lower Bound Estimation (Indexing Approach), Estimation using the Transition Temperature and Estimation using the Upper Shelf.  In addition, Known Fracture Toughness values, if available, may be entered directly.

The Material Toughness Dialog in INSPECT's Part 9 Crack-Like Flaw Level 2 Analysis

Detailed Part 9 FFS Reports

INSPECT quickly creates professional, easy-to-read FFS reports.  With the click of a button INSPECT generates detailed Part 9 assessment reports.  The reports also include any necessary supporting calculations, such as original Code of Construction or wind & seismic equations as well.

A Detailed API 579 Part 9 FFS Report Created by INSPECT

INSPECT Featured Capabilities